Culturally critical examination of high-impact practices through a case study of graduate students’ virtual teaching abroad experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v38i1.1130

Keywords:

Cross-cultural teaching, college students in India, culturally responsive teaching, high-impact practices, internationalization of higher education

Abstract

This study explores how instructors participating in teaching abroad applied high-impact practices (HIPs) and strategies to make their teaching effective in the teaching abroad setting, using a culturally critical lens. We interrogated the applicability of HIPs across different cultures, considering that they originate from U.S. higher education and cultures. Using a case study approach, we interviewed five graduate students who participated in a teaching abroad program, from a university in the U.S., teaching college students in India.  Instructors implemented HIPs in the ways that they practiced in U.S. classrooms. They did not yield the same effectiveness due to the instructors’ imperfect knowledge of the Indian students and the subtle epistemological ethnocentrism. The instructors reflected on their critical consciousness, which enabled them to view students as partners and sources of knowledge, and by employing a significant level of clarity in their communication to make HIPs more culturally responsive in the virtual class. 

Abstract in Korean

본 연구는 교차문화적 관점을 바탕으로, 해외 파견 수업(teaching abroad)에 참여한 교수자들이 고임팩트 교수·학습 전략(High-Impact Practices, HIPs)을 어떻게 적용하였으며, 해외 수업 맥락에서 효과적인 수업을 구현하기 위해 어떠한 전략을 사용하였는지를 탐색한다. 특히 HIPs가 미국 고등교육 제도와 문화에서 발전하였다는 점을 고려하여, 서로 다른 문화적 맥락에서의 적용 가능성을 비판적으로 검토하였다. 사례연구 방법을 활용하여, 미국 대학 소속으로 해외 파견 프로그램에 참여해 인도 대학생들을 가르친 대학원생 강사 5명을 인터뷰하였다. 교수자들은 미국 교실에서 실천하던 방식 그대로 HIPs를 적용하였다. 그러나 인도 학생들에 대한 충분하지 못한 이해와 미묘한 인식론적 자문화중심주의로 인해  동일한 효과를 거두지 못하였다. 포커스그룹 인터뷰에서 교수자들은 자신의 문화와 HIPs 적용 교수법을 비판적으로 성찰하면서 성공적 교차문화적 수업경험을 위해 현지 학생들은 단순히 지식 수용자가 아닌 수업을 함께 구성해가는 필수 협력자로 인식하게 되었다. 또한 의사소통의 명확성을 크게 강화함으로써, 가상 수업 환경에서HIPs를 보다 문화감응적 방식으로 재구성하는 방법을 모색하였다.본 연구는 고등교육 국제화 시대에 해외 파견 교수자들이 타문화적 맥락에서 효과적이고 의미 있는 대학 수업을 운영하기 위해 요구되는 핵심 역량을 이해하는 데 기여하고자 한다.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Seonmi Jin, Indiana University Bloomington

Seonmi Jin is an Assistant Professor of Leadership and Higher Education at the University of Redlands. Her research centers on advancing meaningful internationalization in higher education through culturally relevant and decolonizing approaches within intercultural educational contexts. She also examines curricular transformation in STEM disciplines and institutional change in teaching and learning to better serve students from diverse backgrounds. 

Sharon Daley, Indiana University Bloomington

Sharon Daley is an Associate Clinical Professor at Indiana University. She works in the Elementary Literacy program which is a part of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, in Bloomington, Indiana. Her research focuses on improving undergraduate teacher preparation and understanding mentoring and induction experiences of novice teachers.   

Kriti Gopal, University of Texas at Austin

Dr. Kriti Gopal is a Senior Program Coordinator at the Harkey Institute for Entrepreneurial Studies at The University of Texas at Austin. Her research examines the lived experiences of Indian international graduate students in the United States, drawing on transition and ecological frameworks. With a professional background in student affairs and global engagement, her work centers on student success, belonging, and institutional systems that shape opportunity in higher education.

References

Alur, M. (2001). Some cultural and moral implications of inclusive education in India. Journal of Moral Education, 30(3), 287–292 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240120077243

Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, (pp. 397-456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Briscoe, P., & Robino, C. (2022). Transformative learning in international short-term teach abroad programs. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 34(4), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v34i4.719

Buchanan, L. (1990). Some effects of culture in the ESL classroom and their implications for teaching. MinneTESOLl Journal, 8, 73-87.

Chanana, K. (1993). Accessing higher education: The dilemma of schooling women, minorities, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in contemporary India. Higher Education, 26(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575107

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practices in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7.

Chow, P. & Cho, K. (2011). Expanding U.S. Study Abroad to India: A Guide for Institutions. Institute of International Education. https://www.iie.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Expanding-Study-Abroad-India-final-version.pdf

Cowen, T. (2020). Harvard in Hyderabad? The future of US higher education could be in India. Mint. https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/the-future-of-us-higher-education-could-be-in-india-11597276742768.html

Crabtree, R. D., & Sapp, D. A. (2004). Your culture, my classroom, whose Pedagogy? Negotiating effective teaching and learning in Brazil. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260826

Dave, R. H., & Hill, W. H. (1974). Educational and social dynamics of the examination system in India. Comparative Education Review, 18(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/445753

Davis, T., & Hart, D. M. (2010). International cooperation to manage high-skill migration: The case of India–U.S. relations. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010

de Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898

Dussel, E. (2008). Philosophy of liberation, the postmodern debate, and Latin American studies. In M. Moraña, E. Dussel, & C. A. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 335–349). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388883-014

Ellinghaus, K., Spinks, J., Moore, G., Hetherington, P., & Atherton, C. (2019). Learning to teach in the field: five professors tell how running an overseas study tour improved their classroom teaching. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 31(1), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v31i1.448

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Gawarikar, V., & Pramanik, S. (2015). Foreign education regulatory bill- A ray of hope or despair. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 20(6), 25-30.

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Postmodernism and the discourse of educational criticism. Journal of Education, 170(3), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748817000303

Guiffrida, D.A. (2006). Toward a cultural advancement of Tinto's theory. The Review of Higher Education 29(4), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0031

Hanvey, R. G. (1982). An attainable global perspective. Theory into practice, 21(3), 162-167.

Hwang, A., Ang, S., & Francesco, A. M. (2002). The Silent Chinese: The Influence of Face and Kiasuism on Student Feedback-Seeking Behaviors. Journal of Management Education, 26(1), 70-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290202600106

Haeckl, A. E., & Manwell, E. A. (2009). Integrating study abroad into the curriculum. Routledge.

Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_5

IDEAS. (2022). 2022 IDEAS grant competition aligning your IDEAS grant proposal with U.S. Department of State Foreign Policy Goals. Increase & Diversity Education Abroad for U.S. Students (IDEAS). https://www.studyabroadcapacitybuilding.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/IDEAS-2022-FPG-Alignment-Session.pdf

IDEAS (n.d.). IDEAS grant competition. Increase & Diversity Education Abroad for U.S. Students (IDEAS). https://www.studyabroadcapacitybuilding.org/ideas-grant-competition/grantee-profiles/

Jayadeva, S. (2019). English‐medium: Schooling, social mobility, and inequality in Bangalore, India. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 50(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12287

Kim, K. (2015). Similarities and differences between teachers’ and students’ views on corrective feedback–Korean context. The Bridge: Journal of Educational Research-Informed Practice, 2(3), 42-70.

Kim, K. O. (1993). What is behind “face-saving” in cross-cultural communication. Intercultural Communication Studies, 3(1), 39-47.

Koljatic, M., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education. Higher Education, 42, 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017993113390

Kubow, P. K. (2018). Exploring Western and non-Western epistemological influences in South Africa: Theorizing a critical democratic citizenship education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(3), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1305881

Kramer, S. (2021). Key findings about the religious composition of India. Paw Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/21/key-findings-about-the-religious-composition-of-india/

Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 14(3), 28-29.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

Lee, J. S. (2010). Culturally relevant pedagogy for immigrant children and English language learners. Teachers College Record, 112(14), 453-473.

Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in Education. Revised and expanded from "Case study research in education.". Jossey-Bass.

Milligan, J. A. (2000). Neocolonialism and Peace Corps teaching in the Philippines. Philippine Studies, 48(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.13185/2244-1638.4197

Museus, S. D. (2014). The culturally engaging campus environments (CECE) model: A new theory of success among racially diverse college student populations. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29, pp. 189–227). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_5

Nevgi, A., Tella, S., & Nishimura, S. (2008, May). The Effect of High-ontext/Low-context Culture to University Teachers’ Use of ICTs in Teaching And to Teaching Approaches in Finland, Japan and India. SoTL 7th International Conference. London, UK. https://tinyurl.com/46em6w4p

Park, H. S., & Kang, S. (2025). Mismatched expectation: lessons learned from university student engagement behaviours with an instructor’s feedback in Korea. Educational Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2025.2573312

Quezada, R. L. (2004). Beyond educational tourism: Lessons learned while student teaching abroad. International Education Journal, 5(4), 458-465.

Raina, N. (2015). Effective teaching-learning strategies and quality of higher education in India: Some reflections. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 6(4), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-478x.2015.00040.3

Rao, S. S. (2008). India’s language debates and education of linguistic minorities. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(36), 63–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40277928

Rastogi, M., Baral, R., & Banu, J. (2022). What does it take to be a woman entrepreneur? Explorations from India. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(2), 333-356.

Reagan, T. (2017). Non-Western educational traditions: Local approaches to thought and practice. Taylor & Francis.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.

Rubenstein, I. Z. (2006). Educational expectations: How they differ around the world: Implications for teaching ESL college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920500442224

Sharma, S. K. (2014). Review of INDIA-US Partnership: Asian challenges & beyond, Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 9(1), 82–86.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

USIEF. (2013). Fulbright to India. An orientation and handbook for U.S. Fulbright fellows, United States-India Education Foundation (USIEF).

Valiente, C. (2008) Are students using the “wrong” style of learning? A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 73–91.

Ydesen, C., Albertsen, T., & Garsdal, J. (2011). Totality and exteriority: The case of high-stakes testing in intercultural education. In O. Kofoed, J. Kromann, M. Paulsen., & C. Ydesen (Eds.), Learning from the Other: Intercultural metalogues (pp. 273-295). NSU Press.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90023-X

Zaidman, N. (2001). Cultural codes and language strategies in business communication: Interactions between Israeli and Indian businesspeople. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 408-441.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Jin, S., Daley, S., & Gopal, K. (2026). Culturally critical examination of high-impact practices through a case study of graduate students’ virtual teaching abroad experience. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 38(1), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v38i1.1130

Issue

Section

Research Articles