Pakistani Students' Informal Interactions with Turkish Students at a Turkish Host University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v37i2.897Keywords:
EFL contexts, globalization of higher education, informal interactions, migrant students, study abroadAbstract
Abstract in English
This study investigated the social interactions of Pakistani students with their Turkish friends at a Turkish host university, Middle East Technical University (METU). The article describes the nature of the communication between students from different backgrounds from the perspective of Pakistani students, focusing on communication occurring in dorms and during breaks as settings of student interaction beyond the classroom. Qualitative data was collected through four weekly rounds of semi-structured group interviews with six Pakistani male students. The participants discussed their relationships with Turkish students, interaction patterns, and topics of their dialogue. The data demonstrates that Pakistani students had initiated and maintained conversations but as time passed, Turkish students began reciprocating and initiated conversations. The topics discussed among the two groups varied from exams to cultural differences. The findings shed light on the evolving relationships between international (Pakistani) students and Turkish students at METU, highlighting how cultural differences and language barriers impact social interactions and intercultural exchange. The significance of this study lies in its emphasis on the need for inclusive environments that facilitate international students' integration, the importance of enhancing support systems for language and intercultural communication, and its valuable insights for Global South-South study abroad programs to strengthen cultural ties.
Abstract in TurkishBu çalışma, Pakistanlı öğrencilerin Türkiye’de bir üniversite olan Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi'ndeki (ODTÜ) Türk arkadaşlarıyla sosyal etkileşimlerini araştırmıştır. Makale, farklı geçmişlere sahip öğrenciler arasındaki iletişimin doğasını, Pakistanlı öğrencilerin bakış açısıyla tanımlamakta olup öğrenci etkileşiminin sınıf dışında gerçekleşen ortamlarda, yurtlarda ve ders aralarında, olanları üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Nitel veriler, altı Pakistanlı erkek öğrenciyle yapılan dört haftalık yarı yapılandırılmış grup görüşmeleriyle toplanmıştır. Katılımcılar, Türk öğrencilerle olan ilişkileri, etkileşim şekilleri ve diyalog konuları ile ilgili yanıtlar vermiştir. Veriler, Pakistanlı öğrencilerin diyalogları başlatıp sürdürdüğünü, ancak zamanla Türk öğrencilerin karşılık verip konuşmalar başlatmaya başladığını göstermektedir. İki grup arasındaki tartışılan konular, sınavlardan kültürel farklılıklara kadar çeşitlenmiştir. Bulgular, ODTÜ’deki uluslararası (Pakistanlı) öğrenciler ile Türk öğrenciler arasındaki gelişen ilişkileri aydınlatmakta olup, kültürel farklılıkların ve dil engellerinin sosyal etkileşimleri ve kültürlerarası değişimi nasıl etkilediğini vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın önemi, uluslararası öğrencilerin entegrasyonunu kolaylaştıran kapsayıcı ortamlar oluşturulması gerekliliğine, dil ve kültürlerarası iletişim için destek sistemlerinin güçlendirilmesinin önemine ve kültürel bağları güçlendirmek amacıyla küresel öğrenci değişim programlarına dair değerli içgörüler sunmasına odaklanmaktadır.
Downloads
References
Ayyoub, M. (2019). Qualitative analysis of cultural adjustment issues in Austria: The case study of Pakistani Ph.D. scholars. New Horizons, 13(1), 31-50. DOI: 10.2.9270/NH.13.1(19).03
Bashir, A., & Khalid, R. (2022). Determinants of psychological adjustment of Pakistani international students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2113214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2113214
Bennett, J. M. (1993). Toward Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Intercultural Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
The Culture Factor. (n.d.). Country comparison tool: Pakistan, Turkey. The Culture Factor. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool?countries=pakistan,turkey/
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional.
Jackson, T. (2020). The legacy of Geert Hofstede. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820915088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820915088
Kramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44(3), 354–367. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000431
Middle East Technical University (METU). (n.d.). General information. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://www.metu.edu.tr/general-information#:~:text=METU%20hosts%20over%201%2C700%20international,research%20at%20various%20academic%20programs
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
Noreen, S., Wei, F. W., Zareen, M., & Malik, S. (2019). The intercultural adjustment of Pakistani Students at Chinese universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5760
ORR, L. M. & Hauser, W. J. (2008). A re-inquiry of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: A call for 21st century cross-cultural research. The Marketing Management Journal, 2. 1-19. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/marketing_ideas/122
Su, X. (2017). The Intercultural Adaptation of the Pakistani Students at Chinese Universities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2236–2240. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051213
Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2005). Understanding intercultural communication (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Toyama, M., & Yamazaki, Y. (2022). Foreign language anxiety and individualism-collectivism culture: A top-down approach for a country/regional-level analysis. Sage Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211069143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211069143
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gizem YILMAZEL, Prof. Dr.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.






