Assessment as Pedagogy in a Compressed-Format Summer Physics Abroad Program
Keywords:Formative assessment, Pedagogical approaches, Physics education, Study abroad, Compressed format course
This paper examines the impact of assessment and instructional practices in a compressed-format physics abroad program for life science students from a large U.S. university system. Using qualitative case study methodology, the study investigated the major pedagogical functions of assessments and their implications on student learning across three international sites. Findings from interviews, focus groups, and survey responses of international physics instructors indicated that instructors accommodated the unique program format and student cohort by fostering a highly supportive and collaborative environment for frequent formative assessments, feedback, and intervention. These pedagogical developments provide students the opportunity to learn physics intensively and gain disciplinary, metacognitive, and intercultural understanding.
ABET (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2020-21. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/
Allen, D. E., Duch, B. J., & Groh, S. E. (1996). The power of problem‐based learning in teaching introductory science courses. In L. Wilkerson & W. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to high education: Theory and practice (pp. 43-52). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966808
Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a
Author (2020). [Title omitted for review.] [Unpublished manuscript].
Becher, T. (1990). Physicists on physics. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377561
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.
Black, P. (2001). Formative assessment and curriculum consequences. In D. Scott (Ed.) Curriculum and assessment (pp. 7-23). Ablex.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Blumenthal, P., & Laughlin, S. (Eds.) (2009). Promoting study abroad in science and technology fields. Institute of International Education. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Publications/Promoting-Study-Abroad-in-Science-and-Technology-Fields
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
Crouch, C., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-838. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1707018
Daniel, E. L. (2000). A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34(2), 298-309.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Giordano, G. (2011). A Quasi-Qualitative Analysis of Time-Compressed Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Course Pedagogy. [Masters thesis, Pennsylvania State University].
Hake, R. R. (1992). Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory. The Physics Teacher, 30(9), 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343637
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14030
Hamir, H. B. (2011). Go abroad and graduate on-time: Study abroad participation, degree completion, and time-to-degree. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln].
Institute of International Education. (2019). Open Doors. Institute of International Education. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors
Kenny, S. S., Thomas, E., Katkin, W., Lemming, M., Smith, P., Glaser, M., & Gross, W. (2001). Reinventing undergraduate education: Three years after the Boyer Report. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/26013/Reinventing+Undergraduate+Education+(Boyer+Report+II).pdf?sequence=1
Klawe, M. (2019, March 6). Why we need more STEM students to study abroad. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mariaklawe/2019/03/06/why-we-need-more-stem-students-to-study-abroad/#3417fc0839ab
Kops, W. J. (2014). Teaching compressed-format courses: Teacher-based best practices. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21225/D5FG7M
MacKenzie, J., & Pritchard, J. (2013). Variation in students' experience of learning in an accelerated, residential, study abroad setting in comparison to their traditional HE experience. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 6. https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/201
Meltzer, D. E., & Thornton, R. K. (2012). Resource letter ALIP–1: Active-learning instruction in physics. American Journal of Physics, 80(6), 478-496. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3678299
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Redish, E. F. (1996, March 14). New models of physics instruction based on physics education research [Paper presentation]. Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, Jena, Germany. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED438184.pdf
Redish, E. F. (1999). Millikan lecture 1998: Building a science of teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), 562-573. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19326
Scott, P. A. (1996). Attributes of high-quality intensive course learning experiences: Student voices and experiences. College Student Journal, 30, 69-77.
Scott, P. A. (2003). Attributes of high-quality intensive courses. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 97, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.86
Seccia, L. (2018). Developing a global engineer: Study abroad experiences of engineering majors in one university system. (Publication No. 10621169) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational researcher, 29(7), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
Sin, C. (2014). Epistemology, sociology, and learning and teaching in physics. Science Education, 98(2), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21100
Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan Jr., M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., ... Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468-1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002
Sutton, R. C., & Rubin, D. L. (2010, June). Documenting the academic impact of study abroad: Final report of the GLOSSARI project. [Conference presentation]. NAFSA 2010 Conference, Kansas City, MO, United States. http://glossari.uga.edu/datasets/pdfs/FINAL.pdf
Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
Van Deusen, B. G. (2007). Moving beyond marketing study abroad: Comparative case studies of the implementation of the Minnesota model of curriculum integration. [Masters thesis, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities].
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wayland, J. P., Chandler, E. W., & Wayland, R. F. (2000, March). Summer scheduling on a traditional campus: Expectations, reality, and implications [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of the Southwestern Marketing Association, San Antonio, TX, United States. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.536.4551&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(5), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.5.9-15
Wyse, D., Hayward, L., & Pandya, J. (Eds.) (2016). Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Sage.