Seeing Local Experiences Through Global Eyes: Duoethnography and the Internationalization of Language Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v36i2.933Keywords:
COIL, collaboration, duoethnography, internationalization of language teacher education, language teacher education, virtual exchangeAbstract
This paper discusses the use of duoethnography in the internationalization of language teacher education, aiming at responding to the following questions: A) how may duoethnography support the internationalization of language teacher education? B) What aspects of language teachers' lives can be explored in dialogical encounters among language teachers and teachers-to-be from different countries? C) What (lasting) impacts may carrying out a duoethnography have on language teachers? Beyond explaining the process of designing an international research-based assignment (IRBA), which aimed at engaging in-service and pre-service language teachers from the U.S. and Brazil in exploring their linguistic experiences, the authors present the rationale and the theoretical basis for developing the IRBA and analyzing the duoethnographies: critical approaches to language teacher education, digital literacies and technology integration in educational praxis, teacher collaboration, and duoethnography as both a process and a method. The analysis revealed that duoethnography may be effective leading to reflection and contributing to issues of equality, mobility, and access.
Abstract in PortugueseEste artigo discute o uso da duoetnografia na internacionalização da formação de professores de línguas, visando responder às seguintes questões: a) como a duoetnografia pode apoiar a internacionalização da formação de professores de línguas? b) Que aspectos da vida dos professores de línguas podem ser explorados em encontros dialógicos entre professores de línguas e futuros professores de diferentes países? c) Que impactos (duradouros) a realização de uma duoetnografia pode ter nos professores de línguas? Além de explicar o processo de elaboração de um tarefa internacional baseada em pesquisa (TIBP), que visava envolver professores de línguas em serviço e em formação inicial nos EUA e no Brasil na exploração de suas experiências linguísticas, as autoras apresentam a justificativa e a base teórica para desenvolver o TIBP e analisar as duoetnografias: abordagens críticas à formação de professores de línguas, letramentos digitais e integração tecnológica na práxis educativa, colaboração docente e duoetnografia como processo e método. A análise revelou que a duoetnografia pode ser eficaz, levando à reflexão e contribuindo para questões de igualdade, mobilidade e acesso.
Downloads
References
Abraham, G. Y., & von Brömssen, K. (2018). Internationalisation in teacher education: student teachers’ reflections on experiences from a field study in South Africa. Education Inquiry, 9(4), 347-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.142803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1428035
Bagno, M. (1999). Preconceito linguístico: o que é, como se faz. Loyola.
Bagno, M. (2014). Preconceito Linguístico. In I. C. A. S. Frade, M. G. C. Val & M. G. C. Bregunci (Eds.), Glossário Ceale: termos de alfabetização, leitura e escrita para alfabetizadores. UFMG/Ceale. https://www.ceale.fae.ufmg.br/glossarioceale/folhade-rosto.
Beatty, B. (2011). From crayons to perfume: Getting beyond contrived collegiality. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9161-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9161-2
Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining Internationalization at Home. In: A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi & P. Scott (Eds.), The European Higher Education Area. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_5
Breault, R. A. (2016). Emerging issues in duoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866
Celinski, P. (2019). Literacies. Media Linguistics Journal, 6(4), 467-483. http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2019.404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2019.404
Cervetti, G., Pardales, M., & Damico, J. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online, 4(4). http://www.readingonline.org/articles/cervetti/.
Costa, E. P., Cruz, M. A. M., & Mattos, A. M. A. (2022). A nova era da globalização: um estudo longitudinal comparativo sobre os impactos da Covid-19 nas práticas de professores de inglês. Interletras, 10, 1-22. http//dx.doi.org/10.29327/214648.10.35-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29327/214648.10.35-2
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
Docherty-Skippen, S., & Beattie, K. (2018). Duoethnography as a dialogic and collaborative form of curriculum inquiry for resident professionalism and self-care education. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 9(3), e76–e82. http//dx.doi.org/10.36834/cmej.42981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.42981
Flores, N. (2019). Translanguaging into raciolinguistic ideologies: A personal reflection on the legacy of Ofelia García. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 9, 45–60. https://research.library.fordham.edu/jmer/vol9/iss1/5.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogia da esperança: reencontro com a Pedagogia do Oprimido. Paz e Terra.
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa (27 ed.). Paz e Terra.
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_4
García, O., & Sylvan, C. E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01208.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01208.x
Guo-Brennan, L., & Guo-Brennan, M. J. (2022). Preparing globally competent professionals and leaders for innovation and sustainability. IGI Global. http://doi.org.10.4018/978-1-6684-4528-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4528-0
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. State University of New York Press.
Hawkins, M. R. (Ed.). (2011). Social justice language teacher education. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694249
Horn, I. S. (2015). Teachers learning together: Pedagogical reasoning in mathematics teachers’ collaborative conversations. In: S. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 333-342). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_19
Jorge, M. L. S., & Ferraz, D. M. (2023). Literacies Made in Brazil: Global and subaltern cosmopolitan literacies. In S. Kerkhoff & H. Spires (Eds.), Critical perspectives on global literacies: Bridging research and practice (pp. 44-59). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320142-4
Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). On qualitative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2016). The decolonial option in English Teaching: can the subaltern act? Tesol Quarterly, 50(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.202
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://www.teachingworks.org/images/files/CRP_remix_HER.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. Allen & Unwin.
Lauricella, A. M. (2005). Community Walk-About: Finding the Hope in Hopelessness. In L. Johnson, M. E. Finn & R. Lewis (Eds.), Urban Education with an Attitude (pp. 121-134). State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791483589-012
Long, A. E., Wolkenhauer, R., & Higgins, M. (2021). Learning through research in a professional development school: A duoethnographic approach to teacher educator professional learning. School-University Partnerships, 14(1), 36–44. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1295780.
López M. M., & Newman, T. (2020). Walk With Me: Caminatas as a Way for Developing Culturally Sustaining Literacy Pedagogies with Preservice Teachers. IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2722-1.ch025
Luke, A. (2018). Literacy, schooling, and social justice: The selected works of Allan Luke. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100951
Mattos, A. M. A. (2018). English teacher critical education in Brazil. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http//dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0929
Mattos, A. M. A., & Jorge, M. L. S. (2014). Formação crítica de professores: por uma universidade socialmente responsável. Proceedings of the Universidad 2014 - 9 Congreso Internacional de Educación Superior, Havana, Memórias.
Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2023). Introduction: Linguistic landscapes in language (teacher) education: Multilingual teaching and learning inside and beyond the classroom. In: S. Melo-Pfeifer (Ed.), Linguistic landscapes in language and teacher education (pp. 1-17). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22867-4_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22867-4_1
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local histories / Global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.
Nascimento, G. (2019). Racismo linguístico: os subterrâneos da linguagem e do racismo. Letramento.
Nguyen, T. L. (2019). A brief analysis of Freire’s dialogue term. Medium. https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/a-brief-analysis-of-freires-dialogue-term-81cb12fd9d71.
Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. E. (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Left Coast Press.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524834
O’Neill, P., & Massini-Cagliari, G. (2019). Linguistic prejudice and discrimination in Brazilian Portuguese and beyond: Suggestions and recommendations. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 3(1), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.37344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.37344
OECD. (2020), Professional collaboration as a key support for teachers working in challenging environments. Teaching in Focus, 34. OECD Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1787/c699389b-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c699389b-en
Ostovar-Nameghi S.A., & Sheikhahmadi, M. (2016). From teacher isolation to teacher collaboration: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 197–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p197
Paris, D. & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
Rubin, J., & Guth, S. (Eds.). (2022). The guide to COIL Virtual Exchange: Implementing, growing, and sustaining Collaborative Online International learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447832-5
Sawyer R. D., & Norris J. (2013). Duoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Sawyer, R. D. & Norris, J. (2012). Writing Duoethnographies. In R. D. Sawyer & J. Norris (Eds.), Duoethnography: Understanding statistics (pp. 75–92). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199757404.003.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199757404.003.0004
Sawyer, R. D., Norris, J. & Lund, D. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Left Coast Press.
Schleifer, D., Rinehart, C., & Yanisch, T. (2017). Teacher collaboration in perspective: A guide to research. Public Agenda.
Snipes, J. T., & LePeau, L. A (2017). Becoming a scholar: A duoethnography of transformative learning spaces. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 576-595. http:// doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1269972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1269972
St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Why Post Qualitative Inquiry? Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931142
SUNY COIL Center. (2014). Faculty guide for COIL course development (version 1.4). SUNY Global Center.
Wang, Y. (2016). Native English speakers' authority in English: Do Chinese speakers of English care about native English speakers' judgments? English Today, 32(1), 35-40. http:// doi.org/10.1017/S0266078415000516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078415000516
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Míriam Jorge, Andrea Machado de Almeida Mattos, Leina Jucá, Mara Barbosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.