The Georgetown University Consortium Project: A Report from the Halfway Mark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v10i1.135Keywords:
Report, Assessment, Georgetown Consortium, Education AbroadAbstract
For those of us collaborating on the project, the Georgetown University Consortium Project (GCP) represents both an end and a beginning. In its research design, this three-year assessment study is an end, the product of a series of conversations among education abroad professionals at Georgetown University, the University of Minnesota, Rice University and Dickinson College.2 The study is a beginning as well, the start of a process that will allow us to shed light on what types of experiences abroad promote meaningful knowledge and skills, and thereby to improve study abroad programming at our institutions. This report written at the half-way mark of the study—a year and a half into it— presents evaluative reflections on the progress and process of the GCP to date.
Downloads
References
Bennett, M.J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R.M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Chin, K. K. (2003). Open Doors: Report on International Educational Exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Engle, L. and J. Engle. (2003). “Study abroad levels: toward a classification of program types.” Frontiers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, IX, 1-20.
Forum on Education Abroad. (2001) Prospectus .[print brochure](1-6)
Freed, B. F. (1995). Second language acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Freed, B. F. (Guest Editor) (1998). Frontiers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. Special Issue: Language learning in a study abroad context, IV.
Hammer, M.R., Bennett, M.J. (1998/2004). The intercultural development inventory (IDI) manual. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.
Hammer, M.R., Bennett, M.J. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443.
Paige, M. (2003) (Ed.). Special issue of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27.
Stansfield, C.W. (1991). A comparative analysis of simulated and direct oral proficiency interviews. In Saranee Anivan (Ed.). Current Developments in Language Testing (pp 199-209). Singapore: Regional English Language Center.
Stansfield, C.W. (1996). Test Development Handbook: Simulated Oral Proficiency Interview (SOPI). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Stansfield, C.W. & Kenyon, D.M. (1992). Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview. System, 20, 347-64.
Vande Berg, M. (2003). A Research-based approach to Education Abroad Classification. Forum on Education Abroad:www.forumea.org/goalsactivities.html.